The same update has to work for your boss, for the people who care about the technical details, and for someone with no background at all. Writing it three separate times is how a thirty-minute task turns into an afternoon.
So I write it once and ask for all three at the same time.
I'm preparing [content] on [TOPIC]. Generate three versions: - for leadership: concise, outcome-focused, what's at stake - for technical folks: data-grounded, methodology-aware - for a general audience: plain language, what it means for them Then highlight which phrases shift between versions, and why.
One pass gives you three voices. The real trick is that last line. Asking it to show which phrases changed, and why, slowly trains your own ear for what each audience needs. Read the leadership version and the plain-language version back to back and the contrast jumps right out.
The model hands you the angles. You still choose the final wording. That part is judgment, and it stays yours.